Talk:Imaginary base numbers: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
(Created page with "=== couple of minor points === When translating the Sidef code to Phix, one thing I noticed is that parse_base() never has to deal with a leading '-', so I took that out. As...")
 
Line 4:
never use a minus sign. The same unnecessary handling exists in the Perl6 code.
Also, the even entries in the second half of the output from Kotlin, Java, Go, D, and C# all fail
to trim the unnecessary trailing ".0" (as the heading says, both pretty minor points). 04:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:07, 9 November 2018

couple of minor points

When translating the Sidef code to Phix, one thing I noticed is that parse_base() never has to deal with a leading '-', so I took that out. As far as I understand it, imaginary base numbers never use a minus sign. The same unnecessary handling exists in the Perl6 code. Also, the even entries in the second half of the output from Kotlin, Java, Go, D, and C# all fail to trim the unnecessary trailing ".0" (as the heading says, both pretty minor points). 04:07, 9 November 2018 (UTC)