Anonymous user
Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols: Difference between revisions
Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols (view source)
Revision as of 21:39, 15 September 2014
, 9 years ago→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added comments for clarification.
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): explain few and perfect) |
m (→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): added comments for clarification.) |
||
Line 22:
:::: A '''few''': I see 3 problems with your code when trying to run them with ooRexx:
::::: I hate to interrupt you here, but I entered a Classic REXX program, not an ooRexx program. I don't care what ooRexx does or doesn't do with the REXX program that I entered; ooRexx has it's own language section and it seems ridiculous to criticize a (Classic) REXX program with the usage of different REXX language (ooRexx). That is one major reason that ooRexx has it's own language section. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 21:39, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
<br>(1) The use of characters that are no longer supported
<br>(2) The use of the Upper instruction that no longer suppored
<br>(3) The omission of the righthand side in assignments
<br>Three is few (althought there ARE other differenced that don't hurt you (yet)
::::: I think you meant to say that "are no longer supported" --- is that ooRexx no longer supports that stuff, but (Classic) REXXes does. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 21:39, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
<br>
<br>Actually I have documented all the differences I knew on July 2012:
| |||