Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): 2 more answers) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→entering ooRexx entries in wrong language section: WHAT is an ooRexx language entry?) |
||
| Line 190: | Line 190: | ||
:: The second entry where '''ooRexx''' was used to show '''ooRexx''' output. ooRexx has it's own language section: ooRexx. Note that I'm not (nor did I ever) state that it wasn't a valid version of a (Classic) REXX program. What I'm saying that if you use ooRexx to interpret/execute it and produce output, you should place the output (and the program entry) in the ooRexx language section. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 21:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC) |
:: The second entry where '''ooRexx''' was used to show '''ooRexx''' output. ooRexx has it's own language section: ooRexx. Note that I'm not (nor did I ever) state that it wasn't a valid version of a (Classic) REXX program. What I'm saying that if you use ooRexx to interpret/execute it and produce output, you should place the output (and the program entry) in the ooRexx language section. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 21:49, 15 September 2014 (UTC) |
||
:::_And this is the point where I disagree and am asking Paddy for his opinion. I fail to see what you mean by '''ooRexx language entry'''. Version 2 is a REXX program and one of the interpreters is used to show the output. I invited you to add the output of others. That would be constructive. |
|||
<br>An ooRexx language entry, to me, is one that uses any of the features of ooRexx such as classes, methods, but also some othe nice stuff like x+=1. --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 23:20, 15 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||