Talk:Idiomatically determine all the characters that can be used for symbols: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→What do you mean by "symbol"?: much better) |
Walterpachl (talk | contribs) (→ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more): new section) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
: I've added a general description of ''symbols'' to the task's requirement, I hope it's a start in the right direction (which is much better than reading my mind or viewing/decoding other examples). The phrase above ''Most computer languages do not give a technical meaning to the term "symbol" (and those that do define it give differing definitions of it), but ···'' was my guideline, knowing full well that my attempt won't fare any better than give some (vague and/or general) description or examples. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 20:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC) |
: I've added a general description of ''symbols'' to the task's requirement, I hope it's a start in the right direction (which is much better than reading my mind or viewing/decoding other examples). The phrase above ''Most computer languages do not give a technical meaning to the term "symbol" (and those that do define it give differing definitions of it), but ···'' was my guideline, knowing full well that my attempt won't fare any better than give some (vague and/or general) description or examples. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 20:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
::That's already a big improvement. Thanks. --[[User:TimToady|TimToady]] ([[User talk:TimToady|talk]]) 23:07, 21 March 2014 (UTC) |
::That's already a big improvement. Thanks. --[[User:TimToady|TimToady]] ([[User talk:TimToady|talk]]) 23:07, 21 March 2014 (UTC) |
||
== ooRexx is an Interpreter of Classic Rexx (and MUCH more) == |
|||
A plea to Gerard Schildberger: |
|||
Again and again you refuse to accept the fact that ooRexx is an interpreter that can perfectly process "classic" Rexx programs that obey a few (actually very few) restrictions. |
|||
I added the modified program and its output to the Rexx section in order to make others aware of the difference. The program was actually also in Category ooRexx as you may have nodiced. |
|||
Please reinstate my program instead of unjustly (re)moving it. --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] ([[User talk:Walterpachl|talk]]) 19:52, 12 September 2014 (UTC) |
|||