Anonymous user
Talk:I before E except after C: Difference between revisions
→On modern C++ as a scripting language
(→Multiple IE or EI in the same word: Stats, great.) |
|||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 36:
:::Thanks for the stats Rdm. I guess I could add ''"Words that could be in multiple categories should be counted in those multiple categories"'' to the task to nail it down, as I wasn't thinking of doing anything more than showing how tenuous the "rule" was. At the moment though I think people referring to the talk page should be OK. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 07:06, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
==Stretch goal==
Added after this comment in the J entry:
:''Note that if we looked at frequency of use for words, instead of considering all words to have equal weights, we might come up with a different answer.''
I found a list of word frequencies and saw that it could be done. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 18:53, 16 April 2013 (UTC)
==c solution==
lex yacc flex bison aren't separate languages at rosettacode, nor should they be. I maintain the flex program is a proper c solution and examples deserve spotlight. --LambertDW 01:41, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
==On modern C++ as a scripting language==
The blog post [http://www.nu42.com/2015/06/translating-rosetta-code-entry-perl-cpp.html Translating a Rosetta Code entry from Perl to C++] by A. Sinan Unur comments on the existing C++ code as well as comparing modern C++ with scripting languages for this task.
<br> --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 18:35, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
| |||