Talk:Huffman coding: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(New page: Umm... this is all wrong. Read the Wikipedia article. According to your scheme Huffman codewords would all be of the form 111...10 or 111...1, but that is not at all the case. --~~~~) |
(Concur) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Umm... this is all wrong. Read the Wikipedia article. According to your scheme Huffman codewords would all be of the form 111...10 or 111...1, but that is not at all the case. --[[Special:Contributions/76.167.241.45|76.167.241.45]] 03:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC) |
Umm... this is all wrong. Read the Wikipedia article. According to your scheme Huffman codewords would all be of the form 111...10 or 111...1, but that is not at all the case. --[[Special:Contributions/76.167.241.45|76.167.241.45]] 03:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC) |
||
: Yep. It is not Huffman coding. (Hmm, I do like the wikipedia description of the two queue method though ...) --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 06:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 06:56, 26 March 2009
Umm... this is all wrong. Read the Wikipedia article. According to your scheme Huffman codewords would all be of the form 111...10 or 111...1, but that is not at all the case. --76.167.241.45 03:59, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Yep. It is not Huffman coding. (Hmm, I do like the wikipedia description of the two queue method though ...) --Paddy3118 06:56, 26 March 2009 (UTC)