Anonymous user
Talk:Hofstadter Q sequence: Difference between revisions
→found the 100000th term,any news?: news for the 1,000,000th term.
(→found the 100000th term,any news?: added some comments.) |
(→found the 100000th term,any news?: news for the 1,000,000th term.) |
||
Line 15:
:: Indeed, I just checked, and as of today, only 5 computer programming examples (out of 49) ''didn't'' execute their programs with (or for) 100,000 terms. It should be noted that this Rosetta Code task didn't specifically ask for (displaying) the 100,000<sup>th</sup> term, so almost every example didn't show it. I modified the three REXX programming examples to show the 100,000<sup>th</sup> term; it was a very minor addition to one of the existing REXX statement. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:07, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
:: I just added support to show the 1,000,000<sup>th</sup> term for the three REXX programming examples, it was no big deal (even for the recursive example). -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:26, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
==Python non-recursive solution==
| |||