Talk:History variables: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(re Markhobley's 'omit from' entry) |
(I will add some notes to the omission tags.) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I take it that Visual BASIC has been 'omit from'-d because it lacks native support, rather than because a solution could be constructed, yes? [[User:Axtens|Axtens]] 06:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |
I take it that Visual BASIC has been 'omit from'-d because it lacks native support, rather than because a solution could be constructed, yes? [[User:Axtens|Axtens]] 06:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |
||
:Indeed. Someone can still implement methods remove the omission tag. As you say, it is not native to the language. For some languages that have a debugger, the debugger will keep track whilst the code is compiled or run in debug mode. However, this information becomes non available at operational runtime. I will add some notes to the omission tags. --[[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 06:28, 29 June 2011 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:28, 29 June 2011
I take it that Visual BASIC has been 'omit from'-d because it lacks native support, rather than because a solution could be constructed, yes? Axtens 06:21, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed. Someone can still implement methods remove the omission tag. As you say, it is not native to the language. For some languages that have a debugger, the debugger will keep track whilst the code is compiled or run in debug mode. However, this information becomes non available at operational runtime. I will add some notes to the omission tags. --Markhobley 06:28, 29 June 2011 (UTC)