Anonymous user
Talk:Hash join: Difference between revisions
m
→clarification needed: added closing parenthesis. -- ~~~~
m (→clarification needed: added verbage about bypass IF statement. -- ~~~~) |
m (→clarification needed: added closing parenthesis. -- ~~~~) |
||
Line 7:
Is Popeye's entry to be '''not''' listed, either because it has no nemesis, or because it wasn't in the 2nd relation list? -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 00:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
(If not, I'll enable the '''if''' statement that bypasses the check for the above condition.) -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 00:43, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
Can the nemeses (plural) be listed on one line (as the REXX example shows)? To me, it looks cleaner, more succint, less screen (output) clutter. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 00:41, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
| |||