Anonymous user
Talk:Hash join: Difference between revisions
Now a task
m (Dkf moved page Talk:Hash Join to Talk:Hash join: capitalisation policy) |
(Now a task) |
||
Line 1:
I've downgraded to a draft task for now; we need more implementations (preferably independent ones!) so that we can be sure that a sufficient common understanding if the task exists. Once there are four language implementations, we can promote back. Also, what about language/runtime systems with built-in hash table support? –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 22:47, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
:Agree on the draft status for now. And despite the, er, fireworks accompanying its creation, I suspect it'll be a good task. I don't see how the built-in-ness of hashes plays one way or the other. The task merely assumes that an appropriate hash implementation will be used, whether built-in or imported or implemented as part of the solution. --[[User:TimToady|TimToady]] ([[User talk:TimToady|talk]]) 04:05, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
:: And it is now a full task, with 5 implementations (right now). I'll do a bit more editing (adding in a print requirement and giving test data) but that won't break the existing implementations. –[[User:Dkf|Donal Fellows]] ([[User talk:Dkf|talk]]) 10:48, 12 December 2013 (UTC)
| |||