Anonymous user
Talk:Hamming numbers: Difference between revisions
→Off-by-one error?
(→Off-by-one error?: Really?) |
|||
Line 6:
Since hamming(1692) = 2^31, the last one before 2^31 is hamming(1691). I changed it in the problem description. --[[User:Dsnouck|Dsnouck]] 08:56, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
: Originally I had the 1691. Tcl had 1690 so I stored all values in an array and found that 1690 was correct. Since I have checked twice, I have reverted your edit, but please check again (as I will tonight). --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 09:09, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
:: I still believe my original remark was correct. I am not going to re-revert. I changed my Scheme program to show some extra output. Maybe some people that submitted other implementations can also check this. Maybe there is something wrong with my implementation. At least we agree on the first 20 :). --[[User:Dsnouck|Dsnouck]] 09:22, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
| |||