Talk:Hamming numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→J Solution limitations: the other values) |
|||
Line 55: | Line 55: | ||
There is no indication of how the J solution is used to produce the 1691'st Hamming number or the millionth. (Or if the algorithm used will work for larger values). --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 15:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC) |
There is no indication of how the J solution is used to produce the 1691'st Hamming number or the millionth. (Or if the algorithm used will work for larger values). --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 15:05, 5 January 2010 (UTC) |
||
: O, I didn't realize this. But the millionth will be a problem. So, should I retreat my solution? --[[User:Gaaijz|Gaaijz]] |
: O, I didn't realize this. But the millionth will be a problem. So, should I retreat my solution? --[[User:Gaaijz|Gaaijz]] |
||
:: Hi, No, keep it in. You might want to mention if the millionth is not achieved due to lack of multi-precision integer arithmetic or excessive run-time though. Thanks. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 05:43, 6 January 2010 (UTC) |