Talk:Halt and catch fire: Difference between revisions
→A bit limited ?
m (→A bit limited ?: calmness first.) |
|||
Line 41:
:::::::: Neither. There is no need to be insulting or vulgar. I merely said that one line of one character is the shortest I could think of. I never said (as you insultingly implied) that one line of '''x''' characters is less than one line of '''y''' characters. I was <u>not</u> commenting on the ''number'' of lines, just the number of ''characters''. Please try to be civil in your choice and tone of words. This <strike>is supposed to be a</strike> used to be a friendly website. Name calling and insults will not bring understanding nor consensus. It's inflammatory and insulting language like this that is giving Rosetta Code a bad reputation. Calm down and ''then'' compose. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 20:08, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
::::::::: Everyone is calm here. Please educate me on how I should have responded. I am not interested in what you think I should ''not'' have said, but what you think I ''could'' have said that would be a complete and valid response to that remark, one which is ''not'' also a valid response to "This sentence ends in a full stop." Explain to me how that was ever going to add anything to the conversation. For extra bonus points also explain to me how I am not supposed to take that remark&reply as an insult to my intelligence. --[[User:Petelomax|Pete Lomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 11:07, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
| |||