Talk:HTTP: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
m (Yes...)
(More discussion)
Line 47: Line 47:


: That said, looking at https://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=HTTP&type=revision&diff=315692&oldid=304000 I agree that the missing output sections should be restored. (Possibly with some markup inserted if there's some crude cdn or anti-malware system we're offending somehow.) --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 16:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)
: That said, looking at https://rosettacode.org/mw/index.php?title=HTTP&type=revision&diff=315692&oldid=304000 I agree that the missing output sections should be restored. (Possibly with some markup inserted if there's some crude cdn or anti-malware system we're offending somehow.) --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 16:38, 6 November 2020 (UTC)

I agree with Pete Lomax - there is strong risk that a very dangerous precedent is being set. The solutions have been subsequently modified and probably they will work (not sure about the AWK version). The Batch File solution has been removed with little justification - are we going to let new users arbitrarily decide what is a programming language and what isn't or what version of a programming laguage should be used or what comments are "allowable" etc. ?

That all these massive changes by new users didn't receive any moderator comment until Pete Lomax pointed it out is also very concerning.
--[[User:Tigerofdarkness|Tigerofdarkness]] ([[User talk:Tigerofdarkness|talk]]) 18:33, 6 November 2020 (UTC)