Anonymous user
Talk:Guess the number/With feedback: Difference between revisions
→What do we mean by "number"? And must the limits be distinct and inclusive?: R's understanding seems OK.
m (moved Talk:Guess the number/With Feedback to Talk:Guess the number/With feedback: capitalization policy) |
(→What do we mean by "number"? And must the limits be distinct and inclusive?: R's understanding seems OK.) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 2:
Please sync with: [[Talk:Guess the number#dupe? (sort of) ]] --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 6:06, 29 October 2010 (UTC)
:Personally, I think this game is a more interesting game than that one. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] 16:44, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
I feel quite lucky to have found this bit of info. However, I rather be able to compare each of the coded at it's most minimal to process the same randomized fully interactive goal...
GUESS THE NUMBER GAME
Please enter a number between 1 and 100: 50
Your guess was too low.
Try again: 75
Your guess was too high.
Try again: 60
You guessed correctly in 3 attempt(s)
Play again? y/n
n
==REXX example==
In REXX
if g>high then do
call ser g 'is above the higher limit of' low
iterate
end
shouldn't this be high?
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 19:10, 30 June 2012 (UTC)
-----
Yes, corrected to:
<lang rexx> if g>high then do
call ser g 'is above the higher limit of' high
iterate
end</lang>
-- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 19:30, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
== What do we mean by "number"? And must the limits be distinct and inclusive? ==
I suspect that the task wants integers, but that's not what is actually said. Having to guess 8.5455445362456 is probably not what you want when you ask for a number between 1 and 10. Furthermore, it does not specify that the "set limits" must be unequal or if they're exclusive or inclusive. For example, are we allowed to look for a number between 4 and 4? What about between 4 and 5?
Should I change the task description?--[[User:ReeceGoding|ReeceGoding]] ([[User talk:ReeceGoding|talk]]) 14:08, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
: I think yours is the R solution which seems to understand the present task requirement.
: There are a lot, (over 100), of other examples, and none marked incorrect.
: (There are some tasks that havent't come out of draft status and have a couple or no implementations where the need for rewrite is more immediate).
: --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 09:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
| |||