Talk:Geometric algebra: Difference between revisions
→Task still needs something...
Line 181:
But also display of asymmetric results seems both ugly and difficult to interpret, so I'll just mention that this is how the task is currently written. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 10:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
:The only way I can understand what you've just wrote here is by assuming you have again confused the geometric product and the inner product.--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] ([[User talk:Grondilu|talk]]) 10:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
::Hmm... you are correct. Testing this, I see that the javascript implementation does indeed give different results with this change. So I guess that must mean that I also imagined this flaw existing in the J implementation. Chalk it up to not double checking my thoughts... Thanks. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]])
== The J solution might be correct but too small ==
| |||