Talk:Geometric algebra: Difference between revisions

Line 181:
But also display of asymmetric results seems both ugly and difficult to interpret, so I'll just mention that this is how the task is currently written. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 10:11, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
:The only way I can understand what you've just wrote here is by assuming you have again confused the geometric product and the inner product.--[[User:Grondilu|Grondilu]] ([[User talk:Grondilu|talk]]) 10:25, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
::Hmm... you are correct. Testing this, I see that the javascript implementation does indeed give different results with this change. SoBut Ilooking guessat that mustflawed meanJ thatimplementation, Ithe alsodeviation imaginedfrom thisthe flawjavascript existingimplementation is real. To simulate it in the Jjavascript implementation, you would need to consider the i and j values as members of a list and only combine values from a/b where the i list and the j list had the same index. ChalkAnyways,, itI'll let you come up with a change to notthe doubletask checkingdescription myto thoughts...catch this issue - if it matters to Thanksyou. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 12:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
 
== The J solution might be correct but too small ==
6,962

edits