Anonymous user
Talk:Generic swap: Difference between revisions
m
added a section header to the first topic to properly place the table-of-contents (TOC) --- (this happens more often than one would think).
(→dc: GNU extension) |
m (added a section header to the first topic to properly place the table-of-contents (TOC) --- (this happens more often than one would think).) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
== task description too language-specific? ==
This task description seems to me a little too language-specific in its concepts.
Line 101 ⟶ 103:
AFIK, dc only has a single data type (numeric value), so how is it '''generic''' swap? --[[User:PauliKL|PauliKL]] 12:52, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
: Would be an interesting question, because since unityped systems are a subset of typed systems. So it can be argued that if dc is unityped, then all the procedures that it implements are generic by default. Interestingly dc is not unityped -
i.e
$dc
[ 1 2 3 4 ]
[ 5 6 7 8 ]
sa sb la lb
f
1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8
[[User:Rahul|Rahul]] 13:47, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
| |||