Talk:General FizzBuzz: Difference between revisions
Remember that JS interpreters are now variously embedded
(Remember that JS interpreters are now variously embedded) |
|||
Line 10:
# You will find a few hundred JS examples which I have contributed here, using the Haskell name '''enumFromTo''' for ''integer enumerations'' – the semantics of which does differ from the Python pragmatic convention, but is very far from denotationally 'incorrect' as you suggest. (The Haskell tradition is rather rigorous about denotational semantics, and the use of 'through' vs 'to' in that English sense is more familiar to US than to UK (including Oxford and Glasgow) usage. See, for example, the Haskell documentation of enumFromTo: [[http://hackage.haskell.org/package/base-4.12.0.0/docs/Prelude.html#v:enumFromTo|enumFromTo]] [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 18:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Remember that JS interpreters are now variously embedded – not only in browsers but also for various kinds of scripting outside the browser. Run the same JS script twice in macOS script editor for example, or from a script launch button in one of the Omni application JS embeddings, and code which worked before your edit now fails and generates an error. I hope you are not going to make a solemn pilgrimage through all my JS code examples on Rosetta Code, and dutifully introduce the same run-time error everywhere :-) (In these scripting contexts, the default name-space is typically the global namespace). [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 19:02, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
| |||