Anonymous user
Talk:Gamma function: Difference between revisions
→bigmath template: added question. -- ~~~~
(Integrals: no need for controversy here) |
(→bigmath template: added question. -- ~~~~) |
||
Line 13:
Actually Gamma is defined on complex numbers. Is the task about its real part only? --[[User:Dmitry-kazakov|Dmitry-kazakov]] 22:25, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
: Yes. Gamma can be defined on complex field, but the same works for real numbers (it is the opposite). The task asks only for the ''real'' one. --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 11:37, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
==bigmath template==
Does anybody know if the '''bigmath''' template is supposed to work here on Rosetta Code? -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 07:52, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
| |||