Talk:Fusc sequence: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
The quality of code is a function of its optimisation for particular contexts. In practice, qualities such as reliability, levels of code reuse, and ease of refactoring will often prove more relevant, and more valuable, than the single-minded shaving away of the number of seconds consumed in run-time. Contexts and code cultures vary, and real legibility varies with coding traditions too. |
The quality of code is a function of its optimisation for particular contexts. In practice, qualities such as reliability, levels of code reuse, and ease of refactoring will often prove more relevant, and more valuable, than the single-minded shaving away of the number of seconds consumed in run-time. Contexts and code cultures vary, and real legibility varies with coding traditions too. |
||
Rosetta code does not claim, and is not equipped, to present unique and canonical versions. It is not clear that such versions could in any case exist. Issues of compliance are less subjective, and more rigorous, if |
Rosetta code does not claim, and is not equipped, to present unique and canonical versions. It is not clear that such versions could in any case exist. Issues of compliance are less subjective, and more rigorous, if delegated to the tooling. Checking Python submissions with tools like pylint and autoPep8, for example, is clearly sensible and constructive. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC) |
||