Anonymous user
Talk:Function prototype: Difference between revisions
Generalize, but to what?
m (Hmmm. They probably need to merge the two articles. :)) |
(Generalize, but to what?) |
||
Line 5:
:::You probably wanted [[wp:Type signature|this link]] instead, which is a more general concept when the language is strongly typed. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 02:45, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
::::Hmmm. They probably need to merge the two articles. :) [[User:Markhobley|Markhobley]] 08:53, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
I agree that this task is overly specific to a particular language design; '''I disapprove of it''' as it stands, because a lot of languages' take on this problem is simply "We do not require declaration-before-use". I was going to suggest that it be generalized to "that which the language requires you to do to write mutually recursive functions", but we already have the task [[mutual recursion]]. I would like to see this draft task generalized to ''state a problem'', allowing languages' methods of solution of it to be illustrated, rather than showing variants of a specific solution. —[[User:Kevin Reid|Kevin Reid]] 21:31, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
| |||