Talk:Function definition: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted
(Lisp, Common Lisp, Intra-page)
Line 37: Line 37:


: Having the example listed under "Common Lisp" signals that it's specific to Common Lisp, which it isn't. Of course one could add identical examples for all Lisp dialects, but I don't think that would be a good idea. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 09:03, 2 March 2008 (MST)
: Having the example listed under "Common Lisp" signals that it's specific to Common Lisp, which it isn't. Of course one could add identical examples for all Lisp dialects, but I don't think that would be a good idea. --[[User:Ce|Ce]] 09:03, 2 March 2008 (MST)

:: Perhaps having the code example under Lisp would be appropriate if there was an intra-page link from Common Lisp pointing to it? --[[User:Short Circuit|Short Circuit]] 20:13, 2 March 2008 (MST)