Anonymous user
Talk:Four bit adder: Difference between revisions
→Motivations behind the task (and point 1 (RC domain)): new section
m (→Extra long, educational version of the task (draft): uncaught GND in tcl, added to the list: wire, bus, gnd) |
(→Motivations behind the task (and point 1 (RC domain)): new section) |
||
Line 141:
# I think I will do that if it seems useful to people, otherwise is the Task part only better than the current one? (Adding tiny bits —but what exactly...— from above?)
# It is what I am doing from this morning (with pauses of course), with emacs and translate.google as dictionary to enlarge a bit my used lemmas set,... so it was not so quick! Subsequent edits show that I should use more the preview button anyway :D --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 18:11, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
== Motivations behind the task (and point 1 (RC domain)) ==
My idea when I've created this task was to begin something I've never started but that was in my mind since eons: implementing a small microprocessor. I know they exist languages like VHDL and Verilog (that by the way are on RC too, and this task should be suitable for them!) and more, but I would like a standalone software, and not to be too much hardware-design bound; i.e., I want an emulator, that emulates the innermost hardware in a lowlevel way, but "outside" behaves like a software emulator (I doubt Bochs and similar do their emulation so "low-level")
I don't know the exact "extension" of what languages like VHDL can do, but once I tried SPICE and it did not grasp my attention as a suitable tool for my idea.
The four bit adder was a pilot test for more similar task (if this sort of tasks are suitable for RC domain, being a little bit hardware-related) (e.g. I discovered on the run that ideas in the Go implementation, according to what I can understand of Go, can "model" a latch, while C impl can't) ... --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 18:48, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
| |||