Anonymous user
Talk:Four bit adder: Difference between revisions
→Extra long, educational version of the task (draft): point 1 and 2
m (→Extra long, educational version of the task (draft): ext link fix / split par) |
(→Extra long, educational version of the task (draft): point 1 and 2) |
||
Line 132:
:# Full treatment of the task subject outside of software is outside Rosetta Code's domain. A brief explanation, with a link to someone else's full treatment, would be more appropriate. Alternately, you could treat gate logic as its own language, and apply implementations for things like mathematical operators and logic, and through sufficient examples describing ''those'', provide for a full treatment via intra-site linking.
:# Where did all that text come from? --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 17:28, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
# Could I write that outside (e.g. on my capo-nord/soci/xmav) and provide a link then? (In case it would be useful for hardware unaware people to dive in the POV that allowed some implementers to use words like Wire and Bus, catching someway the "hardware" PoV I liked for ths task)
# From my fingers. Parts of the explanation are excerpt of stuffs I started to write (in italian) for an old educational course about "informatics" (since my idea was/is that without having an idea about how computers do their things, one could find harder to understand some concepts that could "emerge" even from everyday usage by non-programmers who usually just "click" on the right place) --[[User:ShinTakezou|ShinTakezou]] 17:39, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
| |||