Anonymous user
Talk:Floyd's triangle: Difference between revisions
→Output: comment on the task's 2nd requirement (alignment of numbers and only one blank between numbers on a line). -- ~~~~
(→Output: Intuitive?) |
(→Output: comment on the task's 2nd requirement (alignment of numbers and only one blank between numbers on a line). -- ~~~~) |
||
Line 16:
:: P.S. Should I add an optional goal: ''to add an option to your routine that can produce equi-width columns'' ? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 02:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
::: The last requirement (2nd requirement) --- ''that only one space separates numbers of the last row'' --- this is an incorrect (impossible) requirement as the last line may have different width (length) numbers and some may have one blank, others will have two blanks, and that would preclude the numbers lining up as shown in the example. Case in point would be for a four or fifteen-row Floyd's triangle. If this assumption isn't correct, then the author has to change line four of the example to match their own requirement. For now, I'm programming the 2nd REXX version as it is shown in the example (''The first few lines of a Floyd triangle looks like this''), and that's what the programming example does (and displays), and what almost all examples have shown. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 03:33, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
| |||