Anonymous user
Talk:Floyd's triangle: Difference between revisions
m
→Output: added the name of an affliction.
(incorrect outputs spotted.) |
m (→Output: added the name of an affliction.) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 25:
::::: My bad, I wasn't seeing what I should've been seeing when looking at the other examples. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 16:43, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
::::: I recently learned the name what I had was ''virtual scotoma''. ─── ''The mind sees what it chooses to see''. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 06:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Is Version 1 correct?
Line 34 ⟶ 35:
--The run BASIC, erlang, and FORTRAN results look incorrect. I'll try to fix the FORTRAN entry. --LambertDW 02:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
:Thanks LambertDW, I have marked the other two incorrect and hopefully they will be updated. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 05:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The output I had included for the Common Lisp examples included the NIL the REPL displays when the function is run from there (format t ALWAYS returns NIL). I have removed the NILs from the output section as they aren't "extra," and won't display when the function isn't run from the toplevel.--Sovietologist 20:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
:Thanks Sovietologist. As you can read above, the format specs. are a little more rigorous as a reaction to the [[Pascal's triangle]] task, where you had right triangles being submitted rather than the triangles with symmetry across the vertical centre.--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 19:59, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
| |||