Anonymous user
Talk:Floyd's triangle: Difference between revisions
m
→Output: added the name of an affliction.
(→Output: Intuitive?) |
m (→Output: added the name of an affliction.) |
||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 16:
:: P.S. Should I add an optional goal: ''to add an option to your routine that can produce equi-width columns'' ? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 02:07, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
::: The last requirement (2nd requirement) --- ''that only one space separates numbers of the last row'' --- this is an incorrect (impossible) requirement as the last line may have different width (length) numbers and some may have one blank, others will have two blanks, and that would preclude the numbers lining up as shown in the example. Case in point would be for a four or fifteen-row Floyd's triangle. If this assumption isn't correct, then the author has to change line four of the example to match their own requirement. For now, I'm programming the 2nd REXX version as it is shown in the example (''The first few lines of a Floyd triangle looks like this''), and that's what the programming example does (and displays), and what almost all examples have shown. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 03:33, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
::::Hi Gerard,
::::* First arrange that the columns are of such a width that all the numbers of the last row are separated by one space only.
::::* Then ensure that each column of numbers is packed to the right of its column width.
:::: Et voilà! --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 06:58, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
::::: My bad, I wasn't seeing what I should've been seeing when looking at the other examples. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] 16:43, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
::::: I recently learned the name what I had was ''virtual scotoma''. ─── ''The mind sees what it chooses to see''. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 06:56, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
Is Version 1 correct?
Wide columns only when required by the last line's values.
--[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 08:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
:Looks OK, but output for n=5 is missing. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 12:23, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
addad it. thanks. Version 2 (Gerard's) needs to be fixed --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 13:18, 17 July 2012 (UTC)
--The run BASIC, erlang, and FORTRAN results look incorrect. I'll try to fix the FORTRAN entry. --LambertDW 02:41, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
:Thanks LambertDW, I have marked the other two incorrect and hopefully they will be updated. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 05:21, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
The output I had included for the Common Lisp examples included the NIL the REPL displays when the function is run from there (format t ALWAYS returns NIL). I have removed the NILs from the output section as they aren't "extra," and won't display when the function isn't run from the toplevel.--Sovietologist 20:05, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
:Thanks Sovietologist. As you can read above, the format specs. are a little more rigorous as a reaction to the [[Pascal's triangle]] task, where you had right triangles being submitted rather than the triangles with symmetry across the vertical centre.--[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 19:59, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
| |||