Talk:Flow-control structures: Difference between revisions

Content added Content deleted

Inline

Revision as of 03:54, 13 April 2010 (view source) rosettacode>Dgamey m (re: how much discussion) ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:55, 13 April 2010 (view source) rosettacode>Dgamey m (re: how much discussion) Newer edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:

	The typical RC example is short on explanation. If you can say something informative about the code, ''please'' put it right on the page and not buried behind a link. —[[User:Kevin Reid\|Kevin Reid]] 02:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)		The typical RC example is short on explanation. If you can say something informative about the code, ''please'' put it right on the page and not buried behind a link. —[[User:Kevin Reid\|Kevin Reid]] 02:35, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
	:: Please have a look at the Icon/Unicon example on this page it goes into great detail like I haven't seen on the site before. I'm asking a question about balance of explanation. --[[User:Dgamey\|Dgamey]] 03:54, 13 April 2010 (UTC)		:: Please have a look at the Icon/Unicon example on this page it goes into great detail like I haven't seen on the site before. I'm asking a question about balance of explanation. What would really be helpful would be a couple of balanced examples. --[[User:Dgamey\|Dgamey]] 03:54, 13 April 2010 (UTC)