Talk:Flatten a list: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(NEW: Examples of use missing AND: Omit TI-89?) |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Doh! I have just seen the OCaml entry which has indeed been extended with an Algebraic data type solution, but sadly it misses the deep nesting around 6 and a deeply nested, but ultimately empty sub-list. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 06:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC) |
Doh! I have just seen the OCaml entry which has indeed been extended with an Algebraic data type solution, but sadly it misses the deep nesting around 6 and a deeply nested, but ultimately empty sub-list. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 06:45, 17 August 2009 (UTC) |
||
==Examples of use missing== |
|||
It would be good if all the language examples show how to flatten the list mentioned in the task description. C++, Common Lisp, E, Erlang, and Slate don't do this and R doesn't show example output. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 02:36, 17 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||
==Omit TI-89?== |
|||
Should the TI-89 BASIC entry be changed to an omit from ...? And maybe the text moved to this talk page? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 02:36, 17 October 2009 (UTC) |
|||