Talk:Five weekends: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:28, 6 November 2011 view source rosettacode>Paddy3118 →‎Improve C?: EMBee is right. ← Older edit		Revision as of 03:24, 14 November 2011 view source rosettacode>Paddy3118 →‎Improve C?: Still needs improvement? Newer edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:

	::Hi EMBee, you are right. they are using the [http://www.unix.com/man-page/freebsd/1/ncal/ ncal] external Unix command rather than a C library. I didn't look into it enough. I'll revert back to your edit. Sorry. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] 08:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)		::Hi EMBee, you are right. they are using the [http://www.unix.com/man-page/freebsd/1/ncal/ ncal] external Unix command rather than a C library. I didn't look into it enough. I'll revert back to your edit. Sorry. --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] 08:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

			Given Ledrugs' invitation to delete, from his comment on the removal of the improve tag of ''"this example does not need improvement: it was deliberately written so. If you think it's too devious, delete it."'' I am inclined to either leave it with a notice to improve it, or delete it as the solution does not aid language comparison for this straight-forward task. What do others (Including Ledrug), think? --[[User:Paddy3118\|Paddy3118]] 03:24, 14 November 2011 (UTC)