Anonymous user
Talk:Five weekends: Difference between revisions
→Improve C?: added another section. -- ~~~~
(→Improve C?: added another section. -- ~~~~) |
|||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 15:
Item #1 in '''The task''' uses the term "full weekends" meaning Friday+Saturday+Sunday, but it may be misinterpreted to include months with 5 Saturday+Sunday+Monday in the solution (example, October 2011) --[[User:Atnbueno|Antonio Bueno]] 10:02, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
The task should be renamed to 'Five full weekends' --[[User:Walterpachl|Walterpachl]] 13:15, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
==Improve C?==
Line 25 ⟶ 27:
: That particular example is centered around using an external program, because there are already like five tasks dealing with weekdays which all do more the less the same thing. There's no point in "improving" it so it becomes yet another redundant solution, if you don't think it serves a purpose, go ahead and delete it. If you want to improve something, go improve the other C example instead, because it likely won't calculate past 2038. As to "aiding language comparison", it's too subjective, and I have no opinion about it. --[[User:Ledrug|Ledrug]] 04:52, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
:: the ''improvement'' that i was looking for when adding the tag is achieved by the other C version which doesn't rely on ncal. so i guess the improve tag is no longer needed. however since the solutions used different approaches, i think both can stay.--[[User:EMBee|eMBee]] 06:42, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
:: Sure. +1 --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 09:53, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
==missing sub in "short" REXX program==
In the 3<sup>rd</sup> REXX example: the '''err''' subroutine seems to be missing. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 01:05, 23 October 2013 (UTC)
| |||