Talk:First-class functions/Use numbers analogously: Difference between revisions

From Rosetta Code
Content added Content deleted
mNo edit summary
No edit summary
Line 2: Line 2:
:Maybe, but it depends on how you want to make your comparison. I note that some have just put a link to FcF; it would be nice to make their own comments too, as i would like the page to show a comparison rather than leave the comparison ''wholly'' to the reader. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 18:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
:Maybe, but it depends on how you want to make your comparison. I note that some have just put a link to FcF; it would be nice to make their own comments too, as i would like the page to show a comparison rather than leave the comparison ''wholly'' to the reader. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 18:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
::Fair enough --[[User:Glennj|glennj]] 19:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
::Fair enough --[[User:Glennj|glennj]] 19:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

What is the point of this exercise? This doesn't really demonstrate anything interesting about a language's handling of numbers or functions, and it isn't related to a real-world task. --[[User:Psly4mne|Psly4mne]] 19:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:04, 6 December 2009

It seems redundant to duplicate the First-class functions code here. --glennj 17:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

Maybe, but it depends on how you want to make your comparison. I note that some have just put a link to FcF; it would be nice to make their own comments too, as i would like the page to show a comparison rather than leave the comparison wholly to the reader. --Paddy3118 18:28, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
Fair enough --glennj 19:13, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

What is the point of this exercise? This doesn't really demonstrate anything interesting about a language's handling of numbers or functions, and it isn't related to a real-world task. --Psly4mne 19:04, 6 December 2009 (UTC)