Talk:Farey sequence: Difference between revisions
→Parts of formulae here now invisible to many browsers
Line 78:
: This one doesn't respond to immediate First Aid. I can see why an attempt was made to improve its appearance, though the edits that were made unfortunately hid the Farey sequence itself from most browsers.
: Even before the 22 May 2016 edits, the formulae, though visible, were oddly prefixed by a fragment of undigested LaTeX code ('''\textit'''). Perhaps we should just revert this, for the moment, to its 21 May 2016 condition (at least the task description formulae were visible at that stage), and then aim to fix the undigested \textit tag (if possible) next ? [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 18:45, 18 November 2016 (UTC)
:: For the moment I have gone ahead and restored the visibility of the sequence formulae to Chrome IE/Edge and Safari, at the expense of also reintroducing an earlier glitch - a visible LaTeX fragment.
:: My guess is that restored visibility at the price of a a bit of visual noise, is better than no noise at the price of complete invisibility to most browsers. Please advise if you take a different view. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 22:36, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
| |||