Talk:Factorial base numbers indexing permutations of a collection: Difference between revisions
Talk:Factorial base numbers indexing permutations of a collection (view source)
Revision as of 18:34, 30 May 2019
, 5 years ago→Why not using the inverse of Knuth_shuffle
(→Why not using the inverse of Knuth_shuffle: new section) |
|||
Line 105:
</pre>
I see that the advantage of the rotation is the lexicographical order of generating the permutations, but what is it good for?
:see [[First perfect square in base N with N unique digits#Using Factorial base numbers indexing permutations of a collection]]--[[User:Nigel Galloway|Nigel Galloway]] ([[User talk:Nigel Galloway|talk]]) 18:34, 30 May 2019 (UTC)
| |||