Talk:Factor-perfect numbers: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
:Indeed, don't anyone take this too heavily, but some people should perhaps bear in mind that the purpose of rosettacode is to compare programming languages, rather than test the math proficiency of individual contributors. The two other linked references are almost completely incomprehensible to me: the Klazar/Luca paper seems to be about the theoretical bounds of some unspecified function, albeit at least a relevant one, whereas I cannot identify a single reason why wp:Enumerative combinatorics is any more pertinent than say [[wp:Counting|Counting]] --[[User:Petelomax|Petelomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 13:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC) |
:Indeed, don't anyone take this too heavily, but some people should perhaps bear in mind that the purpose of rosettacode is to compare programming languages, rather than test the math proficiency of individual contributors. The two other linked references are almost completely incomprehensible to me: the Klazar/Luca paper seems to be about the theoretical bounds of some unspecified function, albeit at least a relevant one, whereas I cannot identify a single reason why wp:Enumerative combinatorics is any more pertinent than say [[wp:Counting|Counting]] --[[User:Petelomax|Petelomax]] ([[User talk:Petelomax|talk]]) 13:54, 9 October 2022 (UTC) |
||
F(n) is the number of different factorizations according to the second definition. I will add that, sorry for the lack of explanation. I don't usually try to fully understand the math papers either, I just look for the formulas they prove for useful hints. --[[User:Wherrera|Wherrera]] ([[User talk:Wherrera|talk]]) 17:51, 9 October 2022 (UTC) |
|||