Talk:FASTA format: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(added comments about FASTA file specifications. -- ~~~~) |
m (added a blank line after the bullet points.) |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* blank lines |
* blank lines |
||
* lines that start with a semicolon |
* lines that start with a semicolon [<code>;</code>] |
||
* lines that end with an asterisk |
* lines that end with an asterisk [<code>*</code>] |
||
* data lines that contain blanks, tabs, and other whitespace |
* data lines that contain blanks, tabs, and other whitespace |
||
| ⚫ | |||
<br> |
|||
No attempt was made to format lines that contain <code>␋</code> (vertical tabs, U+0000B) which can be used to specify multiple lines in one record. |
|||
| ⚫ | |||
== "Quality"? == |
|||
I am dubious of the "quality of implementation" claim on the original page. Some laptops purchased last year had 32GB memory and many had 16GB. --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 21:01, 20 April 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Latest revision as of 00:57, 14 September 2016
FASTA file specifications
I didn't know how much of the FASTA file specifications were to be implemented (supported), so for the REXX example (version 2), I took what I could glean from the WIKI article and supported:
- blank lines
- lines that start with a semicolon [
;] - lines that end with an asterisk [
*] - data lines that contain blanks, tabs, and other whitespace
No attempt was made to format lines that contain ␋ (vertical tabs, U+0000B) which can be used to specify multiple lines in one record.
-- Gerard Schildberger (talk) 20:17, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
"Quality"?
I am dubious of the "quality of implementation" claim on the original page. Some laptops purchased last year had 32GB memory and many had 16GB. --Rdm (talk) 21:01, 20 April 2013 (UTC)