Anonymous user
Talk:Executable library: Difference between revisions
m
→Pike problem: grammar
(→Pike problem: Thanks.) |
m (→Pike problem: grammar) |
||
Line 70:
:::Hi eMBee, Are you saying then that the correctly formulated file with a .pmod extension can be used ''both'' as a module and as an executable (without name change)? If so, then all is well. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 08:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
:::: yes, without name change. when used as an executable the extension is ignored. it only matters to separate class and module use.
:::: the .pike extension is only needed to let pike detect the class automatically, otherwise, since classes can be compiled at runtime, i
:::::Ta! --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 09:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
|