Talk:Executable library: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Pike problem: Thanks.) |
m (→Pike problem: grammar) |
||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
:::Hi eMBee, Are you saying then that the correctly formulated file with a .pmod extension can be used ''both'' as a module and as an executable (without name change)? If so, then all is well. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 08:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC) |
:::Hi eMBee, Are you saying then that the correctly formulated file with a .pmod extension can be used ''both'' as a module and as an executable (without name change)? If so, then all is well. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 08:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::: yes, without name change. when used as an executable the extension is ignored. it only matters to separate class and module use. |
:::: yes, without name change. when used as an executable the extension is ignored. it only matters to separate class and module use. |
||
:::: the .pike extension is only needed to let pike detect the class automatically, otherwise, since classes can be compiled at runtime, i |
:::: the .pike extension is only needed to let pike detect the class automatically, otherwise, since classes can be compiled at runtime, i can compile any file as a class manually using <code>program Hailstone_class = compile_file("hailstone.pmod");</code>.--[[User:EMBee|eMBee]] 08:55, 7 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
:::::Ta! --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 09:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC) |
:::::Ta! --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 09:40, 7 November 2011 (UTC) |