Talk:Evaluate binomial coefficients: Difference between revisions
Talk:Evaluate binomial coefficients (view source)
Revision as of 04:46, 23 February 2019
, 5 years ago→A Foolish Consistency is the Hobgoblin of Little Minds
Line 96:
: Hi Nigel, It's a little more complex in example definition there are many functional examples, a comparison between functional and imperative is not the issue. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 18:45, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
:: Hi Donald, could you clarify that sentence ? (Perhaps some words are missing ? It doesn't seem to parse as intelligible English).
:: What is your view of the PEP 8 point that project consistency is more important than stylesheet consistency ?
:: Are you aware that your most recent edit (in which you have again deleted my original comments, replacing them with your own compiler type hints, and removed a number of my structural line breaks) has made the code less readable in more than one dimension, specifically '''against''' the recommendations of PEP 8 ?
:: Do you believe that it is up to you to decide whether or not the distinction between imperative and functional code is significant to other RC contributors ?
:: Is the gist of your somewhat evasive and (to be honest) unintelligible and syntactically unparseable sentence, that you intend to simply continue your campaign of bullying – simply deleting, or gratuitously reducing the quality of other people's code, as if aggressively marking territory in the crudest canine tradition ?
:: Do you genuinely equate the quality of a piece of code with the degree of its consistency to your personal interpretation of PEP8 ? PEP 8 itself explicitly rejects that approach, as Nigel has reminded us ... [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 04:46, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
| |||