Talk:Evaluate binomial coefficients: Difference between revisions

Line 47:
::: You read as if you state you are above this aspect of Python because your cross-language functionally standard (to a standard never divulged, and only grudgingly admitted as not being from Python) takes precedence.
::: Its not the functional style of programming I am taking issue with; if someone wrote a class without a docstring and Python type annotations, but preceded it with a comment block with Java-esque type anotations as comments, then I would take issue with that too - because you have the information but haven't gone that extra step to use the Python idioms - it may well look more like som other languages entry, but it's hardly idiomatic for the ''Python'' community - not some other languages community; and its disingenuous when entries can be marked as being translated from others. (Even then, a better entry would try and translate idioms too). --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 00:47, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
:::: ThatYour isdeletions are absolutely not a 'reversion to Python semantics' – they never moved, nor could they – what you have done is to vandalize and deletingdelete the next level of abstraction up - the more mathematical semantics which are a definining feature pure functional programming in any language.
:::: You have also crudely deleted the type semantics comments, making the code less readable, less easily re-used, less reliable, slower to refactor.
:::: The main problem is not, however, your peculiar sense of code quality, which demonstrably places reliability in second place (see you own edit history, and your dependence on others showing you that your code produces the wrong result), or your angry opinion that only one style of programming should ever be practised in Python, or indeed your failure to appreciate that using well-establish abstractions, with shared names, across several languages is a) an excellent source of Rosetta inight b) exactly what Python itself does (see the reference to Haskell and other languages in the itertools module documentation preface).
:::: The real problem is that you have returned to a very personal, and slightly disturbing, campaign of personal persecution, and to an equation of your personal opinion with divine righteousness, which apparently believe to fully authorise utterly appalling behaviour, include reckless deletions, impoverishing vandalism, and actual curtailment of the editing rights of those who make a different use of Python, and write it in a different style.
:::: Python is not your biggest problem right now. I think you may need a bit of help. This pattern of cognition and behaviour is bound to be affecting other aspects of your life [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 05:41, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
9,655

edits