Talk:Evaluate binomial coefficients: Difference between revisions
Talk:Evaluate binomial coefficients (view source)
Revision as of 05:07, 23 February 2019
, 5 years ago→A Foolish Consistency is the Hobgoblin of Little Minds
Line 109:
:: Do you genuinely equate the quality of a piece of code with the degree of its consistency to your personal interpretation of PEP8 ? PEP 8 itself '''explicitly''' rejects that approach, as Nigel has reminded us ...
:: An Etonian accent is no substitute for (or guide to) intelligence or capacity, and 'foolish' stylesheet consistency is, as PEP 8 takes pains to make clear, no guide to (or lazy substitute for) reliability, readability, ease of refactoring, and general optimisation for particular and specific goals.
:: More importantly, '''theologising personal opinion''', treating it as authority to 'smite the wicked' – deleting and vandalising the code of other contributors (who never do this to you), is very bad for Rosetta Code, very bad for you, and very bad for Python. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 04:46, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
| |||