Talk:Evaluate binomial coefficients: Difference between revisions

Line 50:
:::: You have also crudely deleted the type semantics comments, making the code less readable, less easily re-used, less reliable, slower to refactor.
:::: The main problem is not, however, your peculiar sense of code quality, which demonstrably places reliability in second place (see you own edit history, and your dependence on others showing you that your code produces the wrong result), or your angry opinion that only one style of programming should ever be practised in Python, or indeed your failure to appreciate that using well-establish abstractions, with shared names, across several languages is:
::::'''a)''' a classic and excellent source of Rosetta inightinsight
::::'''b)''' a well established practice in Python modules (see the reference to Haskell and other languages in the '''itertools''' module documentation preface).
:::: The real problem is that you have returned to a very personal, and slightly disturbing, campaign of personal persecution, and to an equation of your personal opinion (and exlusive authority on Python) with divine righteousness, which you apparently believe to fully authorise utterly appalling behaviour, include reckless deletions, impoverishing vandalism, and actual curtailment of the editing rights of those who make a different use of Python, and write it in a different style.
9,655

edits