Talk:Evaluate binomial coefficients: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(→Please desist from deleting Functional Python examples: It's bad style.) |
(→Please desist from deleting Functional Python examples: More like this) |
||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
: Functional programming and what you think my skill level is, is a diversion on your part; the real issue is you overriding established style for your ''personal'' convenience. |
: Functional programming and what you think my skill level is, is a diversion on your part; the real issue is you overriding established style for your ''personal'' convenience. |
||
: --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:37, 21 February 2019 (UTC) |
: --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 17:37, 21 February 2019 (UTC) |
||
: I have improved the functional code by replacing the type information as comments, by the language supported [https://docs.python.org/3/library/typing.html type hints]. Typing <code>help(binomialCoefficient)</code> for example, will return typing information in the way to be expected by Python programmers. Your original type comments above function definitions would need equal effort it seems, to add to a function docstring and would at least help in documnting code in the standard way, but even that was not done - it looked like a poor translation from another programming language. (As you know). --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] ([[User talk:Paddy3118|talk]]) 23:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||