Talk:Evaluate binomial coefficients: Difference between revisions

Line 23:

===Please desist from deleting Functional Python examples===

Paddy or Donald, please curb your appetite for deletionary vandalism, if you can. The example which you deleted as 'obfuscation' was deliberately '''clearer''' than the incumbent, explicitly labelling the implicit products and factorials. It was also, unlike, the incumbent functional version, compatible with Python 3, which requires an import of reduce. There is no need for a resurgence of this destructive and gratuitous campaign, and I have restored the code. You did something similar recently to an example deriving cartesian products from the applicative abstraction. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Paddy or Donald, please curb your appetite for deletionary vandalism, if you can. The example which you deleted as 'obfuscation' was deliberately '''clearer''' than the incumbent, explicitly labelling the implicit products and factorials. It was also, unlike, the incumbent functional version, compatible with Python 3, which requires an import of reduce. There is no need for a resurgence of this destructive and gratuitous campaign, and I have restored the code. You did something similar recently to an example deriving cartesian products from the applicative abstraction. Functional programming is clearly not an area of expertise for you, but that doesn't really seem to be a sufficient reason for aggressively deleting examples of it without warning. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC)