Talk:Evaluate binomial coefficients: Difference between revisions
Content added Content deleted
(Edits on April 17 2016 left formulae invisible on OS X Chrome & Safari) |
|||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
==Edits on April 17 2016 left formulae invisible on OS X Chrome & Safari== |
==Edits on April 17 2016 left formulae invisible on OS X Chrome & Safari== |
||
One problem will be the introduction of redundant white space flanking the Latex expressions inside Math tags. There may be others, but visibility should be restored by reverting the contents of Math tags to their pre-April 17 state. |
One problem will be the introduction of redundant white space flanking the Latex expressions inside Math tags. There may be others, but visibility should be restored by reverting the contents of Math tags to their pre-April 17 state. |
||
===Please desist from deleting Functional Python examples=== |
|||
Paddy or Donald, please curb your appetite for deletionary vandalism, if you can. The example which you deleted as 'obfuscation' was deliberately **clearer** than the incumbent, explicitly labelling the implicit products and factorials. It was also, unlike, the incumbent functional version, incompatible with Python 3, which requires an import of reduce. There is no need for a resurgence of this destructive and gratuitous campaign, and I have restored the code. You did something similar recently to an example deriving cartesian products from the applicative abstraction. [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 10:57, 21 February 2019 (UTC) |
|||