Anonymous user
Talk:Ethiopian multiplication: Difference between revisions
→X86 Smaller version
Line 6:
:You do have to create a function. the intent is for it to be a named function where the name should indicate the functions purpose. I am hoping that most contributors will go with the intent. --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 18:33, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
:: You can clarify the task, and then mark the tasks which don't quite comply. --[[User:Short Circuit|Michael Mol]] 23:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
==X86 Smaller version==
I propose rewording this as something like "More representative of assembler languages without the use of explicit multiplication ops", as it already doesn't follow the letter of the task description w.r.t. separate functions, and I would not want it to become some contest in minimalism. How say you? --[[User:Paddy3118|Paddy3118]] 07:03, 11 May 2010 (UTC)
| |||