Talk:Elliptic curve arithmetic: Difference between revisions
Formula hidden to most browsers by an under-tested cosmetic edit at 20:19, 7 June 2016
(added a new talk section.) |
(Formula hidden to most browsers by an under-tested cosmetic edit at 20:19, 7 June 2016) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 5:
-- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
I think that's a reference to https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Secp256k1 --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 00:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
== multiple additions vs. multiplication ==
Line 13 ⟶ 15:
There certainly seems to be a difference on how the ''multiplication'' is implemented. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
<br>
-----
<br>
Initially, I performed '''N''' additions (via the '''add''' function) and kept getting much different results than the other programming examples (for 12345 repetitions).
I think it would be beneficial if the first ten multiples (1 ──► 12) would be shown so we could compare ''true addition'' via ''multiplicative'' results. -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
==First formula now invisible on standard OS X browsers==
May need tidying up to achieve formula visibility on the OS X platform. Problems may include flanking of LateX expressions with redundant white space inside <math> tags [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 13:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Specifically, the formula y^2 = x^3 + a x + b was hidden to most browsers by an under-tested cosmetic edit at 20:19, 7 June 2016 [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 19:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
|