Talk:Elliptic curve arithmetic: Difference between revisions

Formula hidden to most browsers by an under-tested cosmetic edit at 20:19, 7 June 2016
(Created page with "== secp256k1 ? == What is   '''secp256k1'''   (as mentioned in the Rosetta Codes task's preamble: :::     ''You will use the a and b parameters of secp25...")
 
(Formula hidden to most browsers by an under-tested cosmetic edit at 20:19, 7 June 2016)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:
== what is secp256k1 ? ==
What is   '''secp256k1'''   (as mentioned in the Rosetta Codes task's preamble:
 
Line 5:
 
-- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 
I think that's a reference to https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Secp256k1 --[[User:Rdm|Rdm]] ([[User talk:Rdm|talk]]) 00:33, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 
== multiple additions vs. multiplication ==
(Regarding the   ''extra credit''   part of the task.)
 
 
Has anybody done more research on performing   '''N'''   additions versus multiplication   (as the   '''EchoLisp'''   example has done?
 
There certainly seems to be a difference on how the   ''multiplication''   is implemented.   -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:25, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 
<br>
-----
<br>
 
Initially, I performed &nbsp; '''N''' &nbsp; additions &nbsp; (via the &nbsp; '''add''' &nbsp; function) &nbsp; and kept getting much different results than the other programming examples &nbsp; (for 12345 repetitions).
 
 
I think it would be beneficial if the first ten multiples &nbsp; (1 ──► 12) &nbsp; would be shown so we could compare &nbsp; ''true addition'' &nbsp; via &nbsp; ''multiplicative'' &nbsp; results. &nbsp; -- [[User:Gerard Schildberger|Gerard Schildberger]] ([[User talk:Gerard Schildberger|talk]]) 22:32, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 
 
==First formula now invisible on standard OS X browsers==
May need tidying up to achieve formula visibility on the OS X platform. Problems may include flanking of LateX expressions with redundant white space inside &lt;math&gt; tags [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 13:25, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
 
Specifically, the formula y^2 = x^3 + a x + b was hidden to most browsers by an under-tested cosmetic edit at 20:19, 7 June 2016 [[User:Hout|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout|talk]]) 19:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
9,655

edits