Revision as of 14:52, 10 August 2017 (view source) Hout (talk \| contribs) (→‎Perhaps no need to ask for more than one array ?) ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:19, 10 August 2017 (view source) Thundergnat (talk \| contribs) (Agreed) Newer edit →
Line 3: The description seems attached to the use of two distinct arrays – does that seem necessary ? ( One list/array of tuples/pairs/records might seem more natural in some languages) [[User:Hout\|Hout]] ([[User talk:Hout\|talk]]) 14:49, 10 August 2017 (UTC) :Indeed. In the Perl6 example, I use an array of pairs rather than two separate arrays. Seems to me that _how_ the values are stored is an implementation detail that isn't critical to the task. --[[User:Thundergnat\|Thundergnat]] ([[User talk:Thundergnat\|talk]]) 15:18, 10 August 2017 (UTC)

Talk:Egyptian division: Difference between revisions

Talk:Egyptian division (view source)